Comparative Study of Easement and Compensation Values Case Study on the Construction of Trans Adriatic Pipeline-TAP

Alda Taka, Bahri Musabelliu

Abstract


A comparative study of the easements and compensation values of fruit trees in the cases of pipeline crossing has been undertaken for Albania, Greece, Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. The purpose of the study was to compare assessment methodologies for important land use elements during construction and operation phases of pipelines. Investors in the case of pipeline construction demand land for purchase, rent, right of way or easement for tree planting restriction in the range of 8 m. In this study, only two types of compensation are compared: (i) easement and (ii) fruit tree compensation values. Discussion of the methods and their calculation formulas show that there are differences in easement quotes. They were equal to 50% of the land value in Albania, Greece and Turkey and 60% of the land value in the other countries. In fruit tree compensation, the value differences were even greater due to the application of different methods. They were the lowest in Albania and Turkey compared to other countries. However, in all cases, the compensation and easement rates were in accordance with national legislation and met the basic principle of the property right use and the fair compensation of easements and fruit trees sacrificed by the works.

Keywords: replacement, easement, pipeline construction, economic impact, engineering.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Keeley, J. (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London and Rome: IIED, FAO and IFAD.

FAO. (2008) Compulsory acquisition of land and compensation,

Gary Valentine. (2008) Appraising pipeline easements: A Practical Approach. Right of way, March/April, p. 20-28.

German L,, Schoneveld G., Mwangi E., (2013) Contemporary Processes of Large-Scale Land Acquisition in Sub-Saharan Africa: Legal Deficiency or Elite Capture of the Rule of Law? World Development Vol. 48, pp. 1–18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.03.006.

Guide no. 1, date 5.10.2000. For the technical criteria for calculating the value and maturity age of the fruit trees.

Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. ( 2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 68–79.

Lydian Intrenationa Ltd., Geoteam (prepared by Frederico Giovanneto). (2015) Ressetlement Action Plan for and Above Ground Installation – AGI Armenia, 153p.

Magnioni V. (2008). Just Terms Compensation And The Compulsory Acquisition Of Land.

P. Hall, Ch. Hogan and L. Wills. (2010). Negotiating Pipeline Easements.

South Causasian Pipeline – Expansion of the Project. (2014). Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation SCP Georgia, 153p.

South Causasian Pipeline – Expansion of the Project. (2015). Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation SCP Azerbaijan, 153p.

Tacconi, L. (2007). Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: Theory and narrative. Global Environmental Change, 17, 338–348.

TANAP-Turkey, 2014, Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Above Ground Installations 78 p.

The Bank's environmental and social safeguards policies and procedures are: OP/BP 4.01, Environmental Assessment; OP/BP 4.04, Natural Habitats; OP 4.09, Pest Management; OP/BP 4.10, Indigenous Peoples; OP/BP 4.11,Physical Cultural Resources; OP/BP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement; OP 4.36, Forests; and OP/BP 4.37, Safety of Dams

Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP. (2014). Land and Easement Acquisition Livelihood Restoration Framework, 86 p.

Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP. (2014). Livelihood Restoration Framework, 68 p.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v6i11.1567

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v6i11.1567.g2066

Copyright © 2012-2020 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia.

All Rights Reserved.

The publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  View Legal Code                                                                                                                 

ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.