Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Pigs in Extensive Breeding from Saranda Municipalities of Albania

Artan Xhafa, Keti Margariti, Ilirian Kumbe

Abstract


The main aim of this study was to determine the sero-prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs from extensive breeding of Saranda county in southern of Albania. Was collected 92 samples of pigs sera from 13 extensive farms at the time of slaughter in slaughterhouses. Collected blood was left to express serum and it was kept in a freezer until the time when samples were processed in the laboratory of Microbiology of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Tirana, Albania. Serum samples were examined by indirect ELISA method using ID Screen Multi-species kit (ID.VET., France) for anti-Toxoplasma specific Ig G antibodies, resulting from infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Samples sera presenting S/P value % less than or equal to 40% are considered negative, between 40-50% are considered doubtful, greater than or equal 50% are considered positive. Out of 92 samples collected from 13 farms, 16 sera had anti-Toxoplasma Ig G antibodies. Average prevalence was 17.4%.

Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii, ELISA,    blood samples, antibodies, Saranda, etc.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arko-Mensah, J., K M Bosompem, E A. Canacoo, J.M Wastling and B.D. Akanmori, 2000. The seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pigs in Ghana. Acta. Tropica, 76: 27-31.

Dubey J.P, D.E Hill, N. Sundar, G.V. Velmurugan, L. A. Bandinl, O.C.H Kwok, V. Pierce, K Kelly, M Dulin, P. Thulliez, C. Iwueke and C. Su, 2008. Endemic toxoplasmosis in pigs on a farm in Maryland: isolation and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii" J. Parasitol., 94: 36-41.

El Faragalla M. El Moghazy, I amm`aM. Kandil and 2Raafat M. Shaapan. Toxoplasma gondii: Comparison of some serological tests for antibody detection in sera of Naturally infected Pigs. World Journal of Zoology 6 (2): 204-208, 2011.

Figueiredo J.F, Silva D. A, Cabral, D.D. and Mineo, J.R. (2001): Sero-prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in goats by the Indirect Haemagglutination, Immuno-fluorescence and Immuno-enzymatic tests in the region of Uberlândia, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo. Cruz, 96 (5): 687-692.

Gharekhani J, 2013: Serological study of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cattle from western Iran. Sci. Parasitol, 14 (3):153-157.

Hassan Hajian-Bidar, Heidar Heidari, Aliasghar Bahari, Jamal Gharekhani. Sero-prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic goats in western Iran. International Journal of Advanced Research Volume 2, Issue 8, 639-643, 2014.

Ionela Hotea, Gh. Dărăbus, M.S. Ilie, K. Imre, A. Balint, D. Indre, Mirela Imre, Denisa Sorescu, Roberta Ciocan, Luminiła Costinar, Corina Pascu. Seroprevalence of toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs reared in intensive system from Timis county. Lucrări Stiinłifice Medicină Veterinară Vol. XLIII (1), 2010, Timisoara.

Thrusfield, M. (1997). Veterinary epidemiology. 2nd edition, USA: Black well Sciences, pp. 181-182.

W. Buffolano, 2009. Risk factors for toxoplasmosis in pigs bred in Sicily, Southern Italy. Veterinary Parasitol., 161, 1-8.

Zhou D H, R Liang C.C. Yin, F.R Zhao Z G. Yuan R Q. Lin H Q. Song and X Q. Zhu, 2010. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Pigs from Southern China J. Parasitol., 96: 673-674.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v7i2.1645

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v7i2.1645.g2116

Copyright © 2012-2020 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia.

All Rights Reserved.

The publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  View Legal Code                                                                                                                 

ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.