Political Communication as Epistemic Consumption: A Neuroeconomic Perspective
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to contextualize and unify existing interdisciplinary literature by introducing the concepts of a non-semantic type of communication, namely pragmatic communication. Despite the utility of cognitively deducing the connotative and denotative meaning of the message we also propose that communication without semantics contains a so called expectancy violation utility which causes neurophysiological changes that help the receiver to reduce the uncertainty (or prediction errors) about its environment. Increasing the uncertainty of the environment where the public lives, would create the tendency for the publics to prefer the more surprising messages, that is, more information rich political messages. This uncertainty reduction with uncertainty seeking behavior illustrates the shift from exploitative into explorative behavior of the audience which indirectly impacts the value of the political message, by making the political message obsolete.
Keywords: non-semantic type of communication, communication theory, verbal and non-verbal communications, semantic analysis, Barack Obama, etc.
References
Allyn, J., & Festinger, L. (1961). The effectiveness of unanticipated persuasive communications. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(1), 35.
Barton, S. (1994). Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. American Psychologist, 49(1), 5.
Broadbent, D. E. (2013). Perception and communication. Elsevier.
Chowdhury, G. G. (2003). Natural language processing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 51–89.
Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., & Angela, J. Y. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 933–942.
Durrett, R. (2010). Probability: theory and examples. Cambridge university press.
Foerster, H. von. (1980). Epistemology of communication. The Myths of Information: Technology and Postindustrial Culture, 18–27.
Freeman, W. J. (1999). Consciousness, intentionality and causality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 143–172.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127.
Friston, K., Kilner, J., & Harrison, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 100(1–3), 70–87.
Hanc, J., & Taylor, E. F. (2004). From conservation of energy to the principle of least action: A story line. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 514–521.
Honner, J. (1987). The description of nature: Niels Bohr and the philosophy of quantum physics.
Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11), 1254–1259.
Jensen, K. (1995). The social semiotics of mass communication.
Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. TRENDS in Neurosciences, 27(12), 712–719.
Kullback, S. (1997). Information theory and statistics. Courier Corporation.
Lee, C., & Lee, G. G. (2006). Information gain and divergence-based feature selection for machine learning-based text categorization. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 155–165.
Neyman, J. (1977). Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics. Synthese, 36(1), 97–131.
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 884–892.
Rao, R. P. N., Olshausen, B. A., & Lewicki, M. S. (2002). Probabilistic models of the brain: Perception and neural function. MIT press.
Schlosshauer, M. (2005). Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76(4), 1267.
Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000). Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 473–500.
Shannon, C. E. (2001). A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1), 3–55.
Stapp, H. P. (1972). The Copenhagen interpretation. American Journal of Physics, 40(8), 1098–1116.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.
