BILINGUALISM AND POLYLINGUALISM IN THE CASE OF THE LANGUAGES IN THE REPUBLIC OF KARAKALPAKSTAN

Kurbaniyazov Gulmurza Allamberganovich

Abstract


Thanks to Independence, the language policy and language situation in the Republic of Karakalpakstan has changed dramatically since then, and there are great prospects for the free development and equality of languages of all peoples. Indeed, as in all regions, the people of Karakalpakstan have made unprecedented steps in their internal structure, their qualitative changes, and shifts in the ethnic strata of the population. As the Uzbek and Karakalpak languages are the state language in Karakalpakstan, the social functions of these languages have expanded. It has been widely used as a means of communication among people of different nationalities. The languages in the Karakalpakstan region were analyzed by dividing 1) the South - Uzbek language zone and (2) the north - the Karakalpak language zone. The Karakalpak, Kazakh, Turkmen and Russian-speaking population, which make up the majority of the population in the country, are fluent in Uzbek, in addition to their native language. Issues such as bipolar disorder in some places, individual bipolar disorder in some areas, multilingualism, where and in what regions they are encountered, are discussed in this article.

Keywords: a linguistic situation, a bilingual  and polylingual conversation,a communication  process, a socio-linguistic zone, karakalpak. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullayev, Yu., Bushuy, A. (2002). Yazik i obshestvo. Т.

Arazkuliyev, S. (1961). Garagalpakistan ASSRning Dortgul rayonindaki turkmen gepleshikleri. Ashxabat.

Baskakov, N.А. (1952). Razvitiye yazikov i pismennosti narodov SSSR // Voprosi yazikaznaniya. №3.

Bell, R.T. (1980). Sotsiyolingvistika. Seli, metodi i problemi. M.

Berdimuratov, E. (1973). Razvitiye karakalpskoy leksiki v svyazi s razvitiyem funktsionalnix stiley literaturnogo yazika. Diss: …d-ra. filol nauk. Nukus.

Bondaletov, V.D. (1987). Sotsiyalnaya lingvistika. М.

Vinogradov, V.А., Koval, A.N., Tarxomskiy, V.Ya. (1984). Sotsilingvisticheskaya tipologiya Zapadnoy Afriki. М.

Zadixina, К.L. (1952). Uzbeki delti Amudaryi / Trudi Xorezmskoy arxeologo-etnograficheskoy ekspeditsii. Т.I. М..

Istorika-tipologicheskiya xarakteristiki strukturi tyurkskix yazikov. М.,1975.

Karakalpakskiy yazik / Yaziki narodov SSSR. Т.II Tyurkskiye yaziki, М. Nauka, 1966.

Nokolskiy, A.B. (1976). Sinxronnaya sotsiyolingvistika. М.

Umarov, А. (1973). Sopostavitelniy sintaksis russkogo i karakalpakskogo yazikov. Nukus.

Sheveyser, А.D. (1982). K probleme sotsiyalniy deferentsistsii yazika // VOPROSI I YAZILAZNANIYA. М.: №5.

Nasirov, D.S. (1973). Razvitiye karakalpaskogo yazikaznaniya za godi sovetskoy vlasti // SOVETSKAYA TYURKOLOGIYA, №3.

Esemuratova, R. (1963). Razvitiye karakalpakskoy leksiki posle velikoy Oktyabrskoy sotsiyalogicheskoy revolyutsii. Avtoref. diss. …kand. filol. nauk. Т.

Beketov, B. (1969). Kazaxskiy govor v yujnoy Karakalpakii. Avtoref. diss. …kand. filol. nauk. Alma-ata.

Dospanov, U. (1965). Leksika yujnogo dialekta karakalpakskogo yazika. Avtoref. diss. …kand. filol.nauk. Alma-ata.

Dospanov, U. (1981). Qaraqalpaq tilining qubla dialekti hem onin til o'zgeshelikleri. Filol. filol. fanlari. d-ri. …diss. avtoref. Toshkent.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v8i9.1960

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v8i9.1960.g2390

Copyright © 2012-2019 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia.

All Rights Reserved.

The publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  View Legal Code                                                                                                                 

ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.