BRITONS AND MASKED STRANGERS IN JAMES I’S EMPIRE: A HISTORICIST STUDY OF OTHELLO, THE MOOR OF VENICE

Houria Halil, Bouteldja Riche

Abstract


This research seeks to explore Shakespeare’s representation of Britons and strangers in Shakespeare’s Othello, the Moor of Venice (1604) in the context of the accession of James I to the throne of England, and the resulting dramatic shift in geopolitical strategy as well in the conception of the British Empire. This historical reading of the play will be supplemented by an appeal to literary theories about archetypes, the Other, and the notions of play and masks.One of the major arguments of the research is that the idea of empire in Shakespeare’s drama finds one of its best expressions not solely in The tempestas most postcolonial critics often prone to claim,but also in Othello, a play written and performed at a transitional period in British history marked by a significant change of dynasty and a concomitantshift in the notion of empire, from that of a defensiveimperium as a mark of English national sovereignty to that of British Empire in the modern sense of the word. This redefinition of empire in the early Jacobean period, we would also contend, was sustained by a drastic re-deployment in geopolitical strategy that made of the stranger or the Other and the Same vital issue in the process of the definition of self-hood and nationhood.

Key words: Shakespeare, Othello, British Empire, the Mediterranean, the Other, the Same.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, P. (1985). This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine: The Tempest and the discourse of colonialism. In J. Dollimore& A. Sinfield (Eds.) Political Shakespeare: New essays in cultural materialism. Manchester: Manchester UniversityPress.

Caillois, R. (1967). Lesjeux et les hommes: Le masque et le vertige. Paris: Gallimard.

Frobisher, M. (1972). A true discourse of the three voyages of discoverie, for the finding of a passage to Cathay. In R. Haklyut.The Principle navigations, voyages, traffiques and discoveries of the English nation(Vol. 5).London: Penguin.

Gillies, J. (1994). Shakespeare and the geography of difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean negotiations:The circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon.

Greenblatt, S. (1991). Marvelous possessions: The wonder of the New World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Howe, S. (2002). Empire: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hulme, P. (1986). Colonial encounters: Europe and the native Caribbean 1492 – 1797. New York: Methuen.

Knapp, J. (1992). An empire nowhere: England, America and literature from utopia to The Tempest. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kristeva, J. (1988). Etrangers à nous-mêmes. Paris : Le Seuil.

Marienstras, R. (1981). Leproche et le lointain: Sur Shakespeare, le drame Elisabéthain etl’idéologie anglaise aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles : Paris : Les Editions Minuits.

Marshall, T. (2000). Theatre andempire: Great Britain on the London stages under James VI and I. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Matar, N. (2008). Islam in Britain, 1558–1685. New York, NY : Columbia University Press.

Matar, N.(1999). Turks, Moors, and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery. New York, NY: ColumbiaUniversity Press.

Minois, G. (1998). Le diable. Paris: Puf.

Ronald, S. (2007). The pirate queen: Elizabeth I, her pirate adventurers and the dawn of empire. New York, NY: Harper.

Riche, B. (2012). William Shakespeare’s cross-generic representation of empires: A reconsideration of some classic postcolonial readings of his drama. International Journal of Arts and Sciences. 5 (3) 253-267.

Riche, B. (2011) Shakespeare’s language and cultural politics in Othello. Revue de la pratique des langues. (2) 1-20.

Shakespeare, W. (2001). Othello. London:Penguin.

Skura, M. (1989). Discourse and the Individual: The case of Colonization and The Tempest. Shakespeare Quarterly. (40) 42-66.

Trevelyan, G.M. (1982). English socialhistory: A survey of six centuries, Chaucer to Queen Victoria. London: Pelican.

Valensi, L. (2009). Venice and the Sublime Porte: The birth of the despot. A. Denner (Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Vitkus, D. J. (1997). Turning Turk in Othello: The conversion and damnation of the Moor. Shakespeare Quarterly. (Vol. 48, No.2).

Willis, D. (1989). Shakespeare’s tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism. Studies in English Literature 1500-1900. 277-89.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v8i11.1985

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v8i11.1985.g2442

Copyright © 2012-2021 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia.

All Rights Reserved.

The publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  View Legal Code                                                                                                                 

ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.