MANIFESTATIONS OF POVERTY IN WORLD LITERATURE

Amir Hossain, Arburim Iseni

Abstract


This study would like to examine manifestations of poverty in the light of world literature. For this purpose, it would like to investigate the selected-literary texts, like Kazi Nazrul Islam’s “Poverty”, Thomas Montague Traherne’s Poverty, and Charles Dickens’ Hard Times. It aims to look at the real picture of poverty of the age, which has been reflected in their works. It would like to focus upon the manifestations of poverty and its relation with the current age. Nazrul, Dickens, and Traherne have led their personal lives with great hardship, bitterness experiences, psychological problems, like trauma and paranoia during their life span. They have tried to draw a light upon personal inflicting senses and mental disorders of the poor communities through their literary works. They have wanted to explore the practical circumstances and dark aspects of human society, community, and culture with a view to bringing about revolutionary changes of the poor community of the world around. Of course, such writers and their literary works are the symbol of today’s society as well as literature. In this sense, it may be expressed that Nazrul, Dickens, and Traherne are the representatives of the age. The researchers’ goal is that poverty is profoundly dealt with human life; no literature can express his perfect feeling and imagination if he has not tasted the bitterness experience of poverty in life. In many countries of the world, many litterateurs have focused upon the practical experiences of social problems of their hard times in the name of poverty. Thus, this study would like to foster unexplored-glaring themes of poverty through investigating the selected-works as well as the critical comments regarding poverty made by critics and scholars.

Keywords: Poverty, Hard Times, Spiritual Crisis, Nazrul, Traherne, and Dickens.  


Full Text:

PDF

References


Balakier, J.J. (1998). “Thomas Traherne’s Concept of Felicity the ‘Highest Bliss’, and the Higher States of Consciousness of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s Vedic Science and Technology.” Modern Science and Vedic Science. 4: 2, p.136.

Bloom, H. (2004). The Victorian Novel. United States: Chelsea House Publishers.

Bradshaw, T.K. (2005).Theories of Poverty and Anti-Poverty Programs in Community Development. Human and Community Development Department University of California, Davis, CA, USA, p.10-11.

Briggs, A. (1955). Victorian People: A Reassessment of Persons and Themes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cazamian, Louis. (1973).The Social Novel in England, 1830-1850: Dickens, Disraeli, Mrs. Gaskell, Kingsley, trans by Martin Fido. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Daiches, D. (1960).A Critical History of English literature: Volume IV. London: Secker and Warbury.

Dickens, Ch. (1854). Hard Times. London: Penguin Books.

Drabble, M. (2000).The Oxford Companion to English Literature. New York, America: Oxford University Press.

Drake, B. (1970). “Thomas Traherne’s Songs of Innocence.” Modern Language Quarterly 32, p.493.

Harris, J. (1994). Private Lives, Public Spirit: Britain 1870-1914. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Books.

Ilhem, S. (2012). “Cultural Outlook of Lierary Dialect in Hard Times and Silas Marner.” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, pp.80-90.

Inge, D. (2007). “Thomas Traherne and the Socinian Heresy in Commentaries of Heaven.” Notes and Queries 252:4, p. 412.

Jan, R. Ed. (2005). A Sober View of Dr Twisse, sect. XVI. Melton, Suffolk, UK: D. S. Brewer, p.133.

Oshi, Mashair Mohammed Jumaa and Yousif Omer Babiker. (2015).“The Conditions of England as Reflected by Dickens’ Social Novel.”SUST Journal of Humanities,vol.16, no.1, pp.40-44.

Radja, M. (2014). Berchaoua. Social Classes’ Differences in Charles Dickens’ Hard Times. Academic Master Dissertation Submitted in the Department of English Language and Literature at Kasdi Merbah University-Ouargla.

Rohima, S., Agus S., Asfi M., Khusnul, A. (2013).“Vicious Circle Analysis of Poverty and Entrepreneurship.”Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), volume 7, issue, pp.33-46.

Salter, K.W. (1965). Thomas Traherne: Mystic and Poet. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, p. 35.

Sharma, S.K. (2017). “Charles Dickens’ Hard Times: A Social Document.” Epitome: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 3, issue 12.

Shaw, G.B. (1912).Introduction to Hard Times. London: Waverly.

Traherne, Th. (1906).The Poetical Works of Thomas Traherne, edited by Betram Dobell. London: Oxford University Press.

---.(1908). Centuries of Meditations, 3rd-century, paragraphs 1-3, London.

Mahfujulla, M. (2015).Nazrul’s Treatment of the Poor and Poverty.

Osborn, J. A. (1964). “A New Traherne: Manuscript.” TLS,p.246.

Perkins, M.G. (1939). Thomas Traherne a Study of the Philosophy of His Poems and Centuries of Meditations. Master’s Theses, pp.11-12.

Valentine, C.A. (1968). Culture and Poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ward, A.W., Trent,W.P., Erskine, J., Sherman, S.P., and Van Doren. C. (1921).The Cambridge History of English and American Literature. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons; Cambridge, England: University Press.

Williams, M. (2012). “Dickens’ Hard Times in Our Times.” The Copperfield Review. 4, pp. 380-292.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v9i2.2043

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v9i2.2043.g2463

Copyright © 2012-2020 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia.

All Rights Reserved.

The publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  View Legal Code                                                                                                                 

ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.