Characteristics of Alice Walker’s Womanism
Abstract
Alice Walker's womanism came up as a reaction to the marginalization of colored women in the mainstream of feminist critical theory and politics, which tended to regard the experiences of white, middle-class, Western, and heterosexual women as universal, thus, neglecting and making invisible the intricate realities of non-white women within it. Womanism, thus, developed as an answer to feminism and became a tool for the black women to challenge the policies which marginalized them. It is a term rooted in black folk culture and it supports inclusiveness rather than exclusiveness. Womanism advocated the self-sufficiency and confidence of women and at the same time emphasized the need for a strong bond among women to fight all kinds of oppression. Walker provides an explicit definition of the term. She insists that the womanist appreciates herself, her culture, her womanly attitudes, and emotions, her heritage and culture. Womanism celebrates the ideals of black life and encompasses the whole sense of being a woman, especially a black woman. This variety of the meanings clearly shows that the words “womanism” denotes many different things. The aim of this paper is to give a short overview of what womanism is and how it came into existence.
Keywords: womanism, feminism, inclusiveness, marginalization, race.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.
