https://www.tycho.iel.unicamp.br/upload/ togel terpercaya bo togel resmi situs togel online pasaran terlengkap bo togel online

CLIL & INFORMAL DIGITAL EDUCATION: LEARNING CONTENTS AND LANGUAGE THROUGH STREAMING PLATFORMS

Natacha Rita Díaz Luis

Abstract


This research concentrates on the importance that digital technologies and their use in informal contexts in the process of learning of English as a communication vehicle and non-linguistic disciplines. This study aims to analyze this spontaneous learning produced by platforms usually utilized by pupils, i.e., to examine the impact that online platforms produce among students regarding the learning of the foreign language concurrently with content learning. Thus, teenagers from 12 to 16 years old who are currently studying Secondary Education have been selected. These students belong to the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) programme. The policy instrument employed was a survey in which pupils shall reflect on how these mediums have contributed simultaneously to the ESL and content learning in this non- formal context. This investigation will contribute to connect formal and informal education, study those aspects which are mainly potentiated when pupils are not at school (in an attempt to introduce them in class and eventually motivate students) and make pupils reflect on their own process of learning.

Keywords: CLIL, ICT, informal education, Secondary Education.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwehaibi, H. O. (2015). The impact of using Youtube in EFL classroom on enhancing EFL students' content learning. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 12(2), pp. 121-126.

Banks, J., Au, K., Ball, A., Bell, P., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, K., Heath, S., et al. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments (Consensus Report). Learning in Informal and Formal Environment (LIFE) Center. Retrieved from http://www.life-slc.org/knowledge-base/report-learning-in-and-out-of-school-in-diverse-environments

Benson, P. (2015). Commenting to learn: Evidence of language and intercultural learning in comments on YouTube videos. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), pp. 88-105.

Brook, J. (2011). The affordances of YouTube for language learning and teaching. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 9(1), pp. 37- 52.

Dizon, G. (2018). Netflix and L2 learning: A case study. The EuroCALL Review, 26(2), pp. 30-40.

Cinganotto, L., & Cuccurullo, D. (2016). Open Educational Resources, ICT and Virtual Communities for Content and Language Integrated Learning. Teaching English with Technology, 16(4), pp. 3-11.

Council of the European Union. (2012). Council Recommendation of 20th December 2012 on the validation of non-formal and informal Learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 398(1), pp. 1–6.

Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of science education and technology, 16(2), pp. 171-190.

Fleck, B. K., Beckman, L. M., Sterns, J. L., & Hussey, H. D. (2014). YouTube in the classroom: Helpful tips and student perceptions. Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(3), pp. 21-37.

Frumuselu, A. D., De Maeyer, S., Donche, V., & Plana, M. D. M. G. C. (2015). Television series inside the EFL classroom: Bridging the gap between teaching and learning informal language through subtitles. Linguistics and Education, 32, pp. 107-117.

Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(5910), pp. 69-71.

Jakonen, T. (2014). Building Bridges - How secondary school pupils bring their informal learning experiences into a Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) classroom. APPLES : journal of applied language studies, 8 (1), pp. 7-28.

Julian Sefton-Green. Literature Review in Informal Learning with Technology Outside School.Report 7, Futurelab Series. Retrieved from: www.futurelab.org.uk/research/lit_reviews.htm.

Martín, M. J. F. (2008). CLIL implementation in Spain: An approach to different models. In Coonan, CM (ed.), CLIL e l'apprendimento delle lingue. Le sfide del nuovo ambiente di apprendimento, Venezia, settembre 2008. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina, 2008, pp. 221-232. Venezia, Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.

Marsh, D. (ed.) 2002. CLIL/EMILE the European Dimension. University of Jyväskyla.

Marsh, D.; Mehisto, P.; Wolff, D.; Frigols, M.J. (2010). The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. En R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31- 48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

García-Peñalvo, F. J. G. (2005). Estado actual de los sistemas e-learning. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 6(2).

Salvadori , I. (2017). Learning Paths for Italian Primary School English Language Teachers: CLIL using ICT. In Capperucci, D. & Guerin, E. (Eds.), Innovative European Approaches for In-service and Pre-service English Language Teachers in Primary Education, pp. 123-149. Edizioni ETS.

Trilla, J., & i Marfull, A. S. (1986). La educación informal. Promociones Publicaciones Universitarias.

Wojtowicz, L., Stansfield, M., Connolly, T., & Hainey, T. (2011, October). The impact of ICT and games based learning on content and language integrated learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference:“ICT for Language Learning", 4th Edition (p. 1-7).

Available at: http://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL2011/conferenceproceedings.php




Copyright (c) 2020 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                     © 2012-2023 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, North Macedonia.

                                                                                           ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

                                         Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

                             The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any.                                                                                                                                     

                                                                                            It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.