Metacognitive Strategies Within Foreign Language Reading Classroom
Abstract
Many current researchers believe that readers need to be aware of and employ effective reading strategies so they accurately understand and retain the information being presented (Maasum & Maarof, 2012). Available literature suggests that metacognitive strategies can help foreign language learners read with better degrees of competency. This work sought to find evidence of metacognitive strategy success rates in 1st, 2nd and 3rd year ESL students on the university level. Student reading success was evaluated using pre and post test tools. The control and experimental group were divided between those who were exposed to the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory (MARSI) and those who were not (control). Based on the research findings, it was concluded that metacognitive strategies for reading do have a positive effect on ESL learners on the university level. In all situations, those students who were exposed to metacognitive strategies on average outperformed their counterparts who were exposed to no such strategies. The way in which it influences test performance, however, does vary according to the evaluation tool.Keywords: Metacognitive Strategies, EFL, Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory (MARSI), second language acquisition, foreign language learners, reading comprehension.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.