Comparative Results in the Treatment of Necrobacilosis in Sheep, Depending from the form of Lameness and Hematological Indicators
Abstract
The study aims to compare the treatment schemes in sheep with Necrobacilosis, depending on the clinical status and hematological indicators. In the period 2012-2014, in four sheep flocks in the area of Malisheva, was experimented three treatment schemes in animals with easily scale, average and heavy limp. Before beginning treatment, the animals were studied hematological indicators. In the first group scheme was used: Oxytetracyclin hydrochloride (Topoxy 10 %) i/muscle. In the second group was used: Linco Spectin i/muscul and in the third group was used: Linco Spectin subcutaneous on the three points in the crown area of the damaged heels. Treatment continued for 3-5 consecutive days. Sheep of all groups were treated with incision of over increased horn hooves and then with their disinfection sprey Chlortetracycline as the day went on medication. The data obtained was processed statistically and faced the efficiency depending on the results and indicators hematological. The best efficiency was reached with the use of preparation Linco Spectin into the muscle and subcutaneous. The faster and better respond animals to the number of grown white cells on account of neutrophils, despite the clinical situation of their lameness. Between effectiveness of treatment and the number of neutrophils were observed correlative connection with medium hardness and positive character. For the same healing results, the use of the preparation Linko Spectin subcutaneously in the crown area of the heel was much lower cost.
Keywords: Necrobacilosis, sheep, area of Malisheva, Linco Spectin, neutrophils, etc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.
