The Character in the Neoclassical Drama
Abstract
Reasonable probability for the doctrine of French neoclassicism resulted in the criterion of mass and harmony that finally should have had an artwork. Through this criterion in neoclassicism it was aimed to be achieved the structural composition of an artwork, but its content should be transmitted either to the reader or to the bystander as reasonable and correct, even though the content was not the epicenter of a neoclassic artwork. Even in this regard, Greek and Roman classicism is compared with neoclassical style, because for Aristotle the characters do not act to show their tempers. but they act according to their roles, which means that a character has a stable character structure and conform to what the structureis, s(he) operates and consequently through the action, the reader, and especially the viewer, is able to recognize the content, source, and the motive of the action of the character.
Key words: Neoclassicism, Sidi, poetics, criteria, character.
References
Vinca, A. Kurs i teorive letrare. Prishtinë, Libri shkollor, 2002, fq. 115-117.
Aristoteli. Poetika, Prishtinë, Buzuku, 1988, fq. 62.
Kornej, P. Sidi, Prishtinë, Rilindja, 1972, fq. 24, 28, 29, 100.
Fraj, N. Anotomia e kritikës,Prishtinë, Rilindja, 1990, fq. 385.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.
