LANGUAGE PERSONALITY PROBLEM IN THE LINGUOPERSONOLOGY

Niyazova Dilbar Kholtemirovna

Abstract


This article examines linguistic personality types, linguistic personality types, and linguistic personality types according to the personal characteristics of the speakers: linguistic personality by social sign, linguistic identity by age types of linguistic person by gender, types of linguistic person by nationality, types of linguistic person by language, dialectal sign according to linguistic types. The following attributes of personality are distinguished in the theory of personalization: intraindivid, interindivid, metaindivid. Inductive, lexicographic, mathematical linguistic methods, method of analysis of the formal characteristic of the text are the most commonly used common-language methods in linguopersonology. In linguopersonology, the inductive method implies a “text-to-author” approach, and the Descriptive, in particular the linguistic description method, explains the separation, classification, structure and function of language units. It is possible to show different features of language units on the basis of lexicographical dictionaries, use mathematical linguistic techniques to characterize individual methods, including the copyright of the text owner, to analyze the length of sentences in the method of formal textual analysis, relationship.

Key words: lingvopersonology, linguistic personality, gender, attribute, intraindivid, interindivid, metaindivid, lexicographic method.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Voronova N.G. Opredelenieob'ekta i predmetalingvopersonologii // Nauchnievedomosti. SeriyaGumanitarnienauki. 2012. № 24 (143). Vipusk 16.

GoriskayaYu.V. Lingvopersonologiya: obzormetodov i metodik // http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?

Lutfullaeva D., Xudoyberganova D. Tilshunoslikdalisoniyshaxsmuammosi // O‘zbektilivaadabiyoti. 2017. №.6. – B.36-37

Neroznak V. P. Lingvisticheskayapersonologiya: k opredeleniyustatusadissiplini // Sborniknauch. trudovMosk. gos. lingv. un-ta. – M., 1996. Vip. № 426.Yazik.Poetika.Perevod. - S. 112-116.

Salahova A. G. Lingvopersonologicheskiypodhod v issledovaniiprofessional'noyyazikovoylichnosti // Filologicheskienauki. Voprositeorii i praktiki. Ch. II. – Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 8 (50). – C. 159-162.

Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. – Toshkent: «O‘zbekistonMilliyensiklopediyasi» Davlatilmiynashriyoti, 2008.

Trubeskoy N. S. Istoriya. Kul'tura. Yazik. – M.: Progress, 1995.

Petrovskiy A. V. Petrovskiy V. A. K ponimaniyulichnosti v psihologii // Voprosipsihologii. – 1981. № 2. – S. 40- 46.

Xudoyberganova D. O‘zbektilidagibadiiymatnlarningantroposentriktalqini: Filol. fan. dokt. ... diss. avtoref. - Toshkent: 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v8i11.1992

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.0001/ijllis.v8i11.1992.g2419

Copyright © 2012-2021 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia.

All Rights Reserved.

The publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  View Legal Code                                                                                                                 

ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.

Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.

The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.