DEFINING SOCIO CHARACTERIZATION OF LANGUAGE: WHAT LANGUAGE REALLY IS!
Abstract
Language has been defined from phonology, morphology and syntactic aspect. But this short communique explores to defend the sociological aspect (communicative aspect) of a language. ‘Language as a means of communication’ superimposes over any other definition if it can be believed two people can draw a language to exist along with other prominent languages and a language is dead when no speaker exists. However, this precise article tends to show minutely what the position of a language is if one knows this language but does not have a second one to interact with that person. Here, the bottom line is that the man cannot utilize this language to serve his communicative purpose. Hence, his language does not serve the purpose of communication. Therefore, the placement of that language is to the category of dying language in which only one person is left for that language to be characterized as a dead language.
Keywords: Communicative aspect, dead language,dying language, existent language, social aspect.Full Text:
PDFCopyright (c) 2021 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© 2012-2023 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, North Macedonia.
ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.
Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.
The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any.
It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.