Is Methacholine Challenge Superior to Exhaled Nitric Oxide in the Evaluation of a Cough Variant Asthma? The Attitude Regarding its Management
Abstract
Background: The aim of our study was the follow up of a patient presented only with dry chronic cough:Which is the main diagnostic procedure and the most effective therapeutic approach available for such patients at the first medical visit and during his follow up? Methods: Seventy patients (21 males and 49 females) age of 40, 47 year, presented only with chronic non productive cough were studied. They did accomplish 3 medical controls for a period of 8 months with a distance of 4 months from each other. A detailed history was taken to evaluate the existence of other contributing factors to chronic cough such as: Asthma, GERD, PNDS, and any respiratory infections. Only 65.71% of them accepted to undergo the Methacholline challenge test and the measurement of Exhaled nitric oxid. Results: From 41 patients who at the first visit were considered to have Cough Variant Asthma (CVA), 47.14% resulted to have GERD as a cofactor to cough and 42.86% resulted to have PNDS as a cofactor. The methacolline challenge test resulted to be positive in 89.13% of the patients at the first visit toward 62.85% who resulted positive at the third visit (p<0.05). The value of Exhaled nitric oxid was elevated at the first visit only in 51.28% of the patients toward 50% who had a high level of it at the third visit. Conclusion: and discussion GERD remains still the most frequent cofactor of chronic productive cough as a variant of asthma.
Keywords: Asthma, methacholine, oxid nitric, cough, GERD.
Full Text:
PDFCopyright (c) 2014 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© 2012-2023 ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies,Tetovo, North Macedonia.
ISSN (print): 1857-8179. ISSN (online): 1857-8187.
Disclaimer: Articles on Anglisticum have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication.
The Journal, Editors and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any.
It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.