COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIRGINIA WOOLF’S ESSAYS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO MRS. DALLOWAY AND THE GREAT GATSBY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58885/ijllis.v14i4.71maKeywords:
Virginia Woolf, Modernism, stream of consciousness , Mr. Benett and Mrs. Brown, Modern Fiction, Mrs. Dalloway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby, Time and Memory, Alienation and Disillusionment, Character Representation, Comparative Literature, etc.Abstract
This essay presents a comparative analysis of Virginia Woolf’s critical essays Mr. Bennet and Mrs. Brown (1923) and Modern Fiction (1919) by examining their theoretical application to two major modernist novels of the early twentieth century: Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway (1925) and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby (1925). The reflective essay explores how Woolf’s essays mark a decisive break from traditional Edwardian literary conventions, calling for a new artistic form that captures the inner life of characters and the fluidity of time. Through Woolf’s argument that fiction should represent consciousness rather than external reality, the essay highlights the transition from traditional narrative structures to modernist experimentation, reflecting the intellectual, social, and emotional transformations of the post–World War I era. By applying Woolf’s theoretical principles to Mrs. Dalloway, the essay illustrates how the novel’s stream-of-consciousness technique, psychological depth, and nonlinear temporality portray the complexity of human identity and memory. In parallel, Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby is analyzed as a complementary modernist text, which, while grounded in the American context, expresses similar concerns with time, disillusionment, and alienation. Both novels depict societies in transition, British and American, in which characters grapple with the collapse of traditional values and the search for meaning in a fragmented modern world. By connecting Woolf’s modernist vision to Fitzgerald’s portrayal of the American Dream, the research underscores how modern literature moves from tradition to contemporary sensibility, emphasizing individual perception over collective convention. The comparative perspective demonstrates that modernist fiction, whether in England or the United States, serves as a universal language that articulates human consciousness, social decay, and the persistent struggle for authenticity.
References
Woolf, V. (1924). Mr. Bennet and Mrs. Brown: London: Hogarth Press, p. 5.
Stevic, A. (2017). Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown: Accessed on (December, 2024): https://campuspress.yale.edu/modernismlab/mr-bennett-and-mrs-brown/.
Brodowicz, M. (2024). 'Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown' by Virginia Wolf Essay: Accessed on (December, 2024): https://author.com/essay-examples/mr-bennett-and-mrs-brown-by-virginia-wolf-essay.
Rishit, M. (2024). Modern Fiction: Themes and Trends in Contemporary Literature: Accessed on (December, 2024): https://litgram.in/modern-fiction-themes/.
Woolf, V. (1922). Mrs. Dalloway: USA, p. 15.
Fitzgerald, F. S. (1925). The Great Gatsby: New York, p. 20.
Sharma, M. (2023). Virginia Woolf’s Modern Fiction—A Paradigm Shift in Literary Criticism: Journal of Advanced Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, Volume 10, Issue 3, p. 1–4.
Brodowicz, M. (2024). Elements of Modern Fiction: Accessed on (December, 2024): https://aithor.com/essay-examples/elements-of-modern-fiction.
Woolf, V. (1966). Collected Essays. London: Hogarth Press, p. 30.
Mrs. Dalloway Comparison: Accessed on (December, 2024): https://sites.gsu.edu/3630/2018/01/31/mrs-dalloway comparison/#:~:text=Both%20novels%20were%20published%201925,decline%20in%20the%20British%20Empire.
A Thematic Comparison of Mrs. Dalloway to The Great Gatsby: Accessed on (December, 2024): https://britlitandacupotea.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/themes-in-mrs-dalloway-and-the-great-gatsby/#comments.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-12-30 (2)
- 2025-12-30 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration/Copyright transfer:
1. In consideration of the undertaking set out in paragraph 2, and upon acceptance by ANGLISTICUM for publication of the manuscript in the Journal, I/We hereby assign and transfer publication rights to ANGLISTICUM, whereas I/We retain the copyright for the manuscript. This assignment provides ANGLISTICUM the sole right and responsibility to publish the manuscript in its printed and online version, and/or in other media formats.
2. In consideration of this assignment, ANGLISTICUM hereby undertakes to prepare and publish the manuscript in the Journal, subject only to its right to refuse publication if there is a breach of the Author’s warranty in paragraph 4 or if there are other reasonable grounds.
3. Editors and the editorial board of ANGLISTICUM are empowered to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Manuscript suitable for publication.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge that: (a) The manuscript submitted is an original work and that I/We participated in the work substantively and thus I/We hereby are prepared to take public responsibility for the work; (b) I/We hereby have seen and approved the manuscript as submitted and that the manuscript has not either been published, submitted or considered for publication elsewhere; (c) The text, illustration, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
5. I/We hereby indemnify ANGLISTICUM and the respective Editors of the Journal as mentioned in paragraph 3, and hold them harmless from any loss, expense or damage occasioned by a claim or suit by a third party for copyright infringement, or any suit arising out of any breach of the foregoing warranties as a result of publication of the manuscript.










